Green Manure and Cover Cropping

I find it interesting to read agricultural texts from different eras of our civilization. At the present moment I am increasing my collection of USDA Yearbooks of Agriculture, which I would recommend to anyone who is curious about agricultural techniques, policies, and studies. Particularly interesting to me are those books which were published during and directly following the Great Depression. In these years, agricultural science was making great leaps and bounds, not necessarily with new discoveries but with scientific proof that the practices of the preceding millennia were indeed spot-on, and that we should continue following our ancestors’ examples of land husbandry.

What follows is an excerpt from the 1938 USDA Yearbook of Agriculture – “Soils and Men”. It was written by A.J. Pieters and Roland McKee. It is titled “The Use of Cover and Green-Manure Crops”.

“A green-manure crop is one used for turning into the soil, whether planted for that purpose or not, and irrespective of whether the crop is turned under while still green or after maturity. A cover crop is one used to cover the soil surface without reference to incorporation with it. The function of a cover crop is mechanical, as to prevent erosion and leaching, to shad the ground, or to protect the ground from excessive freezing and heaving. This is often of special importance in orchards and elsewhere. The function of a green-manure crop is to add organic matter to the soil. As an incident to this function the nitrogen supply of the soil may be increased and certain minerals made more readily available, these effects in turn increasing the productivity of the soil.

The practice of green manuring is very ancient, while the use of cover crops as such is of relatively recent origin. The Greeks turned under broadbeans (Vicia Faba) 300 years before the time of Christ, and the planting of lupines and beans (Phaseolus spp.) for soil improvement was a common practice in the early years of the Roman Republic. The Chinese wrote about the fertilizing value of grass and weeds several hundred years before our era. Buckwheat, oats, and rye were used in this way by the American colonists before the middle of the eighteenth century, and toward the end of that century Maryland and Virginia farmers used the partridge-pea (Chamaecrista fasciculate) for soil improvement. The extensive use of cover and green-manure crops in the United States is a more recent development and has coincided with the realization that land too long cultivated loses its productive power. Since the soils of the Atlantic seaboard and Southern States have been longest in cultivation and most persistently cropped, it is natural that the most important data on the value of green manuring accumulated in the Unites States should come from the experiment stations of this region.

Green-manure crops are used in the expectation that the yields of subsequent crops will be increased, and this hope is commonly realized. Inquiry might well be made as to why the turning under of crops has this effect. The answer is that the addition of plant material increases the content of organic matter in the soil. This results in physical improvement of the soil and stimulates all those biological and chemical processes which in the aggregate result in an increase in soil productivity. When legumes are turned under there is in addition an increase in the nitrogen content of the soil.”

– A.J. Pieters and Roland McKee – “The Use of Cover and Green-Manure Crops”

That is only the introduction to a 13 page paper on the subject. They go on to describe the specific gains to be had by treating your land to a helping of green-manure, whether it be grass, legumes, or even weeds.

The biggest take-away here is this: soil is happiest when put to work. Bare ground is not only unproductive in the present, it is losing future productivity just by being bare. Even if there is nothing you can currently do with a patch of ground, it is best to have something growing there, regardless of what that something is.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “Green Manure and Cover Cropping

  1. Pingback: Green Manure and Cover Cropping | Anonymous Appalachian Agrarian | WORLD ORGANIC NEWS

  2. Doug's avatar Doug

    It is worth noting that we have since learned that they were very wrong about the functions of green manures and cover crops. In reality, ploughing or tilling under organic matter does not increase soil organic matter, it is simply decomposed into CO2 and water. Stable soil organic matter is mainly living microbes and their self constructed ecosystem using organic polymers like glomalin.

    In fact, cover crops do increase soil organic matter by feeding microbes via root exudates, they are not at all a purely mechanical function as once believed. Green manures work precisely because they are cover crops, and the act of ploughing them under at the end actually undermines some of the benefit they produced while growing.

    Like

    • Thanks for your comment. While you are factually correct with your statements, I think you have downplayed that green manuring cover crops still does end in a net positive for the soil AS LONG AS another crop is planted directly afterward vs having not planted a cover crop at all. The comparison being made is between a clean cultivated field vs a cover crop and there isn’t really any argument to be made that the clean cultivated field loses out from a soil health standpoint. Over the years we have definitely learned more in-depth as to why cover cropping improves soil health, but the benefits over clean cultivation can’t be understated. Also keep in mind most commercial agriculture still practices clean cultivation so this article is as valid today as it was when it was published. As always do not let perfect be the enemy of good, we can all take steps towards a sustainable future, but if an available method or technology will take a step forward don’t turn it down just because it isn’t the best one. Every step counts.

      Like

  3. Doug's avatar Doug

    I don’t mean to downplay green manures, as I said they work precisely because they are cover crops. It is just that the method of terminating them (tillage) undoes some of their benefit. My concern is with the statement “The function of a cover crop is mechanical, as to prevent erosion and leaching, to shad the ground, or to protect the ground from excessive freezing and heaving.”. That is not helpful for any farmer to hear or believe. Living plants build soil, not dead ones. That’s why I think much of the old writing on the subject has relatively limited value for farmers.

    Like

    • I differ in my opinion on this passage, and I think maybe a small vocabulary shift might show you what I’m seeing when I read the text. Keep in mind this text is 86 years old, so the reader is encouraged to make some interpretation to acknowledge the massive amount of progress we have made in agricultural science since then, while also acknowledging that at the time of writing ( Dust Bowl America) this topic was immensely helpful . Also keep in mind that around the world a lot of agriculture is still being practiced as it was during the Dust Bowl period, and any step forward is a benefit.

      The vocabulary shift here, based on the evolution of agricultural science, is so small yet profound – as written “The function of a cover crop is mechanical” – modern interpretation would be “One of the functions of a cover crop is mechanical”. The rest of the statement remains true, as compared to clean cultivation and tillage, having a cover crop – even tilling it in after – is a great stride towards preventing all the mentioned dangers. There are more regenerative practices than this that could be adopted over time, but it would always be a good first step up from the previous methods that are now known to rapidly degrade soil health.

      Like

Please share your thoughts: